Prankers Paradise
Jokes
Submit
Moderator
Links
Contact
Drug Rehab
Halloween
|
| |
Drilling
Posted by: Brian on May 10, 2005 @ 11:14 pm
Why do Democrats constantly complain about drilling in Alaska?
They don’t have anything better to do considering none of them have jobs. |
Add your own comment
| From: |
rawahindi on May 13, 2005 @ 10:46 pm |
| Comment: |
That’s probably because Bush is helping big biz to export all jobs to China and India.
And all you republicans can keep working at Wal-mart.
|
| From: |
JM on May 17, 2005 @ 3:06 pm |
| Comment: |
Bill Clinton was the hugger of China.....nobody can exist without them, unfortunately. At least George does what he says he’ll do.....you are mis-informed like most De.s on China and just about every other political issue.
Oh yeah.....who won???!!! I suppose there are those that are still in denial thinking another election was stolen......how pathetic! |
| From: |
I hate Wally-Mart on May 18, 2005 @ 2:00 am |
| Comment: |
THEIR WORKERS ARE PAID SO LITTLE MOST OF THEM QUALLIFY FOR FOOD STAMPS. American taxpayers are paying for their healtcare too. |
| From: |
JM is JizzMonkey on May 19, 2005 @ 12:37 am |
| Comment: |
Misinformed on being a good sport too. The election was stolen. |
| From: |
gary on May 19, 2005 @ 11:59 pm |
| Comment: |
Hey JM, did you ever hear of some asshole named Richard Milhous Nixon? Tell me he never hugged a chink. |
| From: |
gary on May 20, 2005 @ 12:00 am |
| Comment: |
Oh yeay, and fiftyone percent is NOT a mandate!!!!!! |
| From: |
Git-R-Done Redneck on May 20, 2005 @ 8:19 pm |
| Comment: |
Yo Gary
51% ain’t a mandate, he was the first president since Ronald Reagan to get over 50% in the popular vote. Your boy Slick Willy Clinton couldn’t even do that in 2 elections. |
| From: |
eat this on May 21, 2005 @ 8:08 am |
| Comment: |
liberals do america a favor and move to canada,you spineless scumbags.. |
| From: |
gary on May 22, 2005 @ 2:07 am |
| Comment: |
there were three candidates running during Clinton’s victories.
that would be Mr. Peerot and Mr. Nader.
I think that explains that. |
| From: |
Ripper on May 22, 2005 @ 11:15 pm |
| Comment: |
imagine that he couldnt even get 51% against Perot and Nader. Not enough busses to pick up the voters I guess. |
| From: |
Git-R-Done Redneck on May 23, 2005 @ 8:20 pm |
| Comment: |
Yeah, and Perot took away votes from the Republicans (Bush41 and Dole), he didn’t take away votes from Clinton. And I don’t even think Nader ran in 1992 and 1996. If he did, he wasn’t a minor factor like in the 2000 election. |
| From: |
gary on May 31, 2005 @ 4:42 pm |
| Comment: |
FYI - before he became rich and famous that’s how the family pronounced the name.
PEE-rot.
Ask any old Texan. |
| From: |
Bobbbbbb on June 19, 2005 @ 10:19 pm |
| Comment: |
gary. you’re a moron. that’s all. |
|
|
